A city has invested heavily in public transportation, improving access for low-income neighborhoods while simultaneously allowing affluent areas to maintain private transportation options. Which category best describes this situation in terms of urban inequality?

The situation best fits the category of **transportation inequality**. In this case, the city’s new public transit improves mobility for low‑income residents, while wealthier neighborhoods still rely on private cars, creating a gap in transportation options. The inequality is rooted in unequal access to reliable, affordable travel rather than just economic disparity. For example, a bus route that serves a low‑income district runs frequently and cheaply, whereas a nearby affluent area has limited bus service but plenty of parking for cars, leaving residents in the richer area with a transportation advantage. This pattern illustrates how infrastructure investments can still reinforce unequal mobility.