How do the power-elite and Marxist models differ in their view of the role of political protests?

The power-elite model and the Marxist model have different views on political protests and their significance. The power-elite model suggests that a small group of powerful individuals controls most of the resources and decision-making in society, so protests are often seen as ineffective or easily ignored by those in power. In contrast, the Marxist model believes that protests can be a way for the working class to challenge the ruling class and fight for their rights, seeing them as essential to bring about social change. For example, when workers strike for better wages, the Marxist view sees this as a crucial step in challenging economic inequality, while the power-elite model might view it as a minor disruption that doesn't really threaten the established order. Ultimately, the two models highlight different beliefs about who holds power and how ordinary people can influence change through protests.