According to the Davis-Moore Thesis, what is the primary function of social inequality in society, and what are some critiques of this perspective regarding social position?

The Davis-Moore Thesis suggests that social inequality is necessary for the functioning of society because it helps to motivate people to fill important roles. According to this theory, jobs that require more skill or education should offer higher rewards, like money and prestige, to encourage people to work hard and achieve those positions. For example, a doctor spends many years studying and training, so their high salary reflects the importance of their role in keeping people healthy. However, critics argue that this perspective overlooks factors like social privilege and discrimination, which can affect who gets access to these high-paying roles. They believe that not everyone has the same opportunities, so inequality can persist even when it isn't justified by the value of the work.