How does Critical Sociology differ from traditional approaches in its view of researcher objectivity?

Critical sociology differs from traditional approaches by emphasizing that researchers cannot be completely objective when studying society. Traditional sociology often aims for neutrality, suggesting that researchers should detach themselves from their subjects to avoid bias. In contrast, critical sociology argues that researchers' backgrounds, experiences, and social contexts influence their perspectives, which can shape their interpretations of social issues. For example, if a researcher studies poverty but has never experienced it, their understanding may lack depth. Therefore, critical sociology encourages researchers to acknowledge their positions and how these might affect their findings, promoting a more engaged and reflexive approach to understanding social realities.