Optimal outcomes in economics are to resource allocation as sub-optimal outcomes are to which of the following?

In economics, optimal outcomes refer to the best possible use of resources, where they are allocated in a way that maximizes benefits and efficiency. On the other hand, sub-optimal outcomes occur when resources are not used effectively, leading to wasted potential and lower overall benefits. For example, if a farmer has a piece of land that could grow either corn or soybeans but chooses to grow only one crop poorly, that would be a sub-optimal outcome because they are not maximizing their land's productivity. Thus, just as optimal outcomes focus on efficient resource allocation, sub-optimal outcomes reflect inefficiencies that lead to less desirable results. This difference highlights the importance of making informed decisions to achieve the best economic outcomes.