In a game involving two players, Player A has a dominant strategy of choosing option X, while Player B's payoff matrix indicates that choosing option Y is best regardless of Player A's choice. What can be concluded about the Nash Equilibrium in this scenario?

In this game, we see that Player A has a dominant strategy of choosing option X, meaning that X is the best choice for A no matter what Player B does. On the other hand, Player B's payoff matrix shows that option Y is the best choice for them, regardless of whether Player A chooses X or not. Since both players are making the best choices for themselves given the other's decision, we can conclude that the combination of Player A choosing X and Player B choosing Y is a Nash Equilibrium. This means that neither player has an incentive to change their strategy because they are already maximizing their payoffs. For example, if Player A sticks with X and Player B with Y, they both achieve their best possible outcomes based on the other’s choice.