Learning Path
Question & Answer1
Understand Question2
Review Options3
Learn Explanation4
Explore TopicChoose the Best Answer
A
It renders expansionary monetary policy largely ineffective in stimulating job creation.
B
It leads to an immediate increase in interest rates, boosting employment.
C
It allows for greater flexibility in monetary policy, enhancing job growth.
D
It encourages businesses to invest more, leading to a decrease in unemployment.
Understanding the Answer
Let's break down why this is correct
Answer
When a liquidity trap exists, interest rates are already at or near zero, so printing more money does not lower borrowing costs any further. Because the cost of borrowing cannot be reduced, businesses and consumers do not increase spending even though the central bank injects liquidity, so the expected boost in investment and consumption is weak. Consequently, the usual mechanism of expansionary policy—stimulating demand and lowering unemployment—fails to work. For example, if the economy is in recession and the bank raises the money supply, but rates stay at 0 %, firms still see little incentive to borrow and hire, keeping unemployment high. Thus, in a liquidity trap, monetary stimulus is largely ineffective at reducing unemployment.
Detailed Explanation
When interest rates are already very low and people keep saving instead of spending, cutting rates further does not change much. Other options are incorrect because The idea that cutting rates will immediately raise interest rates is wrong; People think a liquidity trap gives policymakers more leeway.
Key Concepts
Impact on Employment Levels
Liquidity Trap
Topic
Expansionary Monetary Policy Effects
Difficulty
medium level question
Cognitive Level
understand
Practice Similar Questions
Test your understanding with related questions
Ready to Master More Topics?
Join thousands of students using Seekh's interactive learning platform to excel in their studies with personalized practice and detailed explanations.