📚 Learning Guide
Ionization Potential
medium

Which statement best explains why nonmetals generally have higher ionization potentials compared to metals?

Master this concept with our detailed explanation and step-by-step learning approach

Learning Path
Learning Path

Question & Answer
1
Understand Question
2
Review Options
3
Learn Explanation
4
Explore Topic

Choose the Best Answer

A

Nonmetals have fewer electrons in their outer shell.

B

Nonmetals have a stronger effective nuclear charge that holds onto their electrons more tightly.

C

Metals readily lose electrons to achieve stability.

D

Nonmetals are larger in atomic size than metals.

Understanding the Answer

Let's break down why this is correct

Answer

Nonmetals have electrons that are held more tightly by their nuclei because they have more protons and a smaller atomic radius, so pulling an electron away requires more energy. Metals, on the other hand, have fewer protons relative to their size, and their valence electrons are farther from the nucleus and shielded by inner electrons, making them easier to remove. Thus, the ionization potential—the energy needed to remove one electron—is higher for nonmetals. For example, the first ionization energy of fluorine is about 1681 kJ/mol, whereas that of sodium is only 495 kJ/mol, showing the larger energy needed for the nonmetal.

Detailed Explanation

Nonmetals feel a stronger pull from their nucleus because the outer electrons are closer to the positive center. Other options are incorrect because Having fewer outer electrons does not make the ionization harder; This idea mixes up the way metals behave.

Key Concepts

atomic structure
nonmetals vs. metals
Topic

Ionization Potential

Difficulty

medium level question

Cognitive Level

understand

Ready to Master More Topics?

Join thousands of students using Seekh's interactive learning platform to excel in their studies with personalized practice and detailed explanations.